Court
Sun's civil antitrust suit was filed in March 2002 in the San Jose Division, United States District Court for the Northern District of California. On August 9, 2002, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, a panel charged with streamlining related cases filed in multiple districts, issued an order transferring Sun's lawsuit to the District of Maryland for inclusion in the central pretrial proceedings in the Microsoft Corp. Windows Operating System Antitrust Litigation, MDL-1332. At the conclusion of the pretrial proceedings in MDL-1332, Suns lawsuit will return for trial to the Northern District of California.
What Sun Charges
Sun's lawsuit charges that Microsoft's illegal behavior harmed the Java platform. In addition to this, the suit specifies that Microsoft:
Engaged in illegal monopolization and/or monopoly maintenance (violation of Section 2 of the Sherman Act) of the:
- Intel-compatible PC operating system market
- Web-browser market
- Office productivity suite market
Attempted to illegally monopolize (violation of Section 2 of the Sherman Act):
- Workgroup server operating system market
Engaged in illegal tying (violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act) of its:
- Internet Explorer web browser to its Windows PC operating system
- Windows workgroup server operating systems (e.g., Windows 2000 Professional and Windows XP Professional) to its PC operating systems
- IIS Web server to its workgroup server operating system (e.g., Windows NT 4.0 and Windows 2000 Server)
- .NET framework to its PC and workgroup operating systems
- Active Directory Software to its Windows workgroup server and PC operating systems and to Exchange server software
- Exchange server software to Office productivity suite
Illegally entered into exclusive dealing and exclusionary agreements (violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act), including, for example, its:
- Agreements with independent software vendors (developers), Apple Computer and Intel not to develop for, distribute or use a non-Microsoft compatible implementation of the Java platform
Engaged in copyright infringement (violation of 17 U.S.C. 501).
Unreasonably restrained trade (violation of California's Cartwright Act).
Engaged in unfair competition (violation of the California Business and Professions Code).
Relationship to Other Litigation
Sun's private antitrust suit is broader in scope than the breach-of-contract suit Sun filed against Microsoft on Oct. 7, 1997. That suit, in which Sun acted to protect the integrity of its Java platform, was settled on Jan. 23, 2001. Microsoft agreed to pay Sun $20 million, and Sun agreed to grant Microsoft a new, limited license to use Java "without modification" for a limited time in a defined set of existing Microsoft products. The settlement agreement specifically provided that Sun did not release any of its claims under antitrust laws.
Further, Sun's private antitrust suit expands significantly on the claims that were pursued by the U.S. Department of Justice and the states in U.S. v. Microsoft. Many of Sun's claims in its private antitrust suit were not adjudicated in the U.S. Department of Justice's case.
In addition, Sun filed a complaint with the European Commission concerning Microsofts activities with respect to the workgroup server market. The European Commission also brought its own ex-officio case. Both procedures are awaiting decision by the Commission.
Back to Top