Sun Blade X6250 Server Module

Sun Blade X6250 Server Module

The Intel Xeon processor makes its debut in a Sun product with the Sun Blade X6250 server module. The Quad-Core Intel Xeon processor adds an incredible range of performance and cost options to your Sun Blade Chassis. With eight separate processing threads per module and ten modules per 10RU Chassis, you're packing some real compute density.


(Tue, 22 January 2008)

Excellent MCAE Performance on ANSYS "Standard" Benchmark

The Sun Blade X6250 server module, equipped with two dual-core Intel Xeon X5260 CPUs and running 64-bit SuSE Linux (SLES10) OS, posted record-breaking scores on a Standard suite of the ANSYS 11 benchmark, improving upon previously posted results by 25% on average.

ANSYS 11 software is a comprehensive multidisciplinary tool combining structural, thermal, fluid, acoustic and electromagnetic simulation capabilities in a single engineering software solution that is applicable to a broad range of industries and applications. To provide customers with a basis for comparison across multiple architectures, operating systems and interconnects, ANSYS has developed a benchmark that has two suites: Standard and Distributed. These suites consist of multiple workloads and cover a representative set of structural analysis solvers and analysis types for stand-alone SMP systems, as well as clustered configurations.

The Standard suite of the benchmark was run on a Sun Blade X6250 server module at different core levels: 1, 2, and the maximum of 4. It is worth noting that the 7 test cases from ANSYS Standard test suite do not scale very well past 8 cores and the memory requirements for these test cases are less than 3GB, making Sun's dual-socket server module with dual or quad core processors the perfect building block for custom engineering solutions. Additionally, as the below table suggests, the same system has also produced stellar results when outfitted with other recent Intel Xeon processors, thus allowing customers more choice and flexibility in their purchasing decisions.

TABLE 1. ANSYS v11.0 "Standard" Benchmark Test Suite
Results are total elapsed run times in seconds (smaller is better)

ANSYS v11.0 "Standard" Benchmark Test Suite
System Processor Cores bm-1 bm-2 bm-3 bm-4 bm-5 bm-6 bm-7
Sun Blade X6250 3.33GHz X5260 1 133 1277 397 163 303 225 1766
Sun Blade X6250 3.0GHz 5160 1 151 1454 456 211 344 253 1773
Intel S5000XAL 3.0GHz 5160 1 164 1416 489 215 340 314 2230
Sun Blade X6250 3.33GHz X5260 2 106 1229 341 140 209 151 1136
Sun Blade X6250 3.0GHz 5160 2 117 1398 385 183 225 168 1065
Intel S5000XAL 3.0GHz 5160 2 128 1356 417 186 244 211 1437
Sun Blade X6250 3.33GHz X5260 4 88 1193 295 124 170 113 843
Sun Blade X6250 3.0GHz 5160 4 99 1358 343 165 181 131 751
Intel S5000XAL 3.0GHz 5160 4 109 1312 369 169 187 161 1048
 

(Tue, 22 January 2008)

Fluid Overachiever on EXA PowerFLOW Benchmark

Four Sun Blade X6250 server modules, each equipped with two dual-core Intel Xeon X5260 CPUs and running 64-bit SuSE Linux (SLES10) OS, have formed an eight CPU cluster that outperforms all results published by other hardware vendors on EXA PowerFLOW benchmark at comparable cluster sizes.

EXA's PowerFLOW CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) application is an MCAE application used by the major engineering companies in a variety of disciplines such as aerospace, automotive and chemical. The EXA PowerFLOW benchmark consists of two compute and memory intensive suites with small and large data sets that model the air flow over a body of a car.

In both cases, the cost-effective solution based on high-performance Sun Blade X6250 servers that were using InfiniBand PCIe ExpressModules interconnected via a Voltaire Grid Director ISR 9096 switch, performs better than competing clusters at the same core count. Additionally, as the below table suggests, the same cluster has also produced stellar results when outfitted with other recent Intel Xeon processors, thus allowing customers more choice and flexibility in their purchasing decisions.

TABLE 1. EXA PowerFLOW V 3.6c Benchmark
Results are total elapsed time in seconds

Smaller Model
System Processor 1 Core 2 Cores 3 Cores 4 Cores
Sun Blade X6250 3.33GHz DC Intel X5260 720.49 389.36 195.43 110.36
Sun Blade X6250 3.0GHz DC Intel 5160 822.71 418.47 214.48 118.63
Sun Blade X6250 3.0GHz QC Intel X5365 844.3 430.72 214.41 121.25
 
Larger Model
System Processor 1 Core 2 Cores 4 Cores 8 Cores
Sun Blade X6250 3.33GHz DC Intel X5260 1714.22 925.77 463.11 252.64
Sun Blade X6250 3.0GHz DC Intel 5160 1996.38 987.47 500.54 258.42
Sun Blade X6250 3.0GHz QC Intel X5365 1991.78 1010.63 507.21 278.64
 

(Tue, 22 January 2008)

Sun's Blades Make Impact on ABAQUS/Explicit Benchmark

Four Sun Blade X6250 server modules, each equipped with two dual-core Intel Xeon X5260 CPUs and running 64-bit SuSE Linux (SLES10) OS, have formed an eight CPU cluster that demonstrated world record performance on ABAQUS/Explicit, a finite element analysis package that simulates brief transient dynamic events (a.k.a. crashes and high velocity impacts).

The ABAQUS/Explicit benchmark suite includes a combination of six high-speed dynamic impact events like projectile penetration or a car crash, and quasi-static events with complicated contact conditions like forming a part out of a blank metal sheet. The benchmark is intended to provide an estimate of the performance that can be expected when running representative ABAQUS analysis jobs on different computer platforms.

In all six cases the Sun Blade X6250-based cluster using InfiniBand PCIe ExpressModules interconnected via a Voltaire Grid Director ISR 9096 switch, performs better than competing clusters at the same core count. Additionally, as the below table suggests, the same cluster has also produced stellar results when outfitted with other recent Intel Xeon processors, thus allowing customers more choice and flexibility in their purchasing decisions.

TABLE 1. ABAQUS/Explicit v6.7 Benchmark with four Sun Blade X6250 server modules
Results are Total Elapsed Time in seconds

ABAQUS/Explicit v6.7 Benchmark with four Sun Blade X6250 Server Modules
Intel CPU Model # of CPU Cores e1 e2 e3 e4 e5 e6
3.33GHz DC X5260 1 23565 12399 11037 4884 4648 11975
3.0GHz QC X5365 1 26401 14236 12302 5456 5349 13266
3.0GHz DC 5160 1 24800 14198 10174 5147 6112 -
3.33GHz DC X5260 2 12008 6465 5218 2647 2447 6739
3.0GHz QC X5365 2 14262 7501 6379 2959 2742 7486
3.0GHz DC 5160 2 14232 7401 5477 2935 3327 7582
3.33GHz DC X5260 4 6536 3488 2660 1384 1243 3849
3.0GHz QC X5365 4 8595 4195 3372 1577 1440 4375
3.0GHz DC 5160 4 10451 4509 3853 1887 1990 5202
3.33GHz DC X5260 8 3634 1849 1468 848 627 2210
3.0GHz QC X5365 8 5650 2556 2158 1090 824 2274
 

(Tue, 22 January 2008)

Top Sun Cluster Crashes Competition on LS-DYNA Benchmark Suite

Four Sun Blade X6250 server modules, each equipped with two dual-core Intel Xeon X5260 CPUs and running 64-bit SuSE Linux (SLES10) OS, have formed an eight CPU cluster that demonstrated world record performance on one of the most popular high velocity impact (a.k.a. "crash") analysis applications LS-DYNA. Sun's cluster surpassed all published results, ranging from one to 8 CPUs, that were posted on topcrunch.org web site, while maintaining superb scalability with the increasing size of the cluster.

The TopCrunch benchmark was created with the objective of tracking the aggregate performance trends of high performance computer systems. Instead of relying upon synthetic workloads, it was built upon an LS-DYNA application that reflects the types of calculations performed in the mechanical and aerospace communities and is used for crash simulation and analysis. The benchmark consists of two standardized problems: "Neon_Refined" and a much larger "3 Vehicle Collision". These problems were chosen to reflect current engineering practices in the real world and are not intended to be optimal, because engineers rarely have time to optimize their analysis in real life.

The Sun Blade X6250-based cluster using InfiniBand PCIe ExpressModules interconnected via Voltaire Grid Director ISR 9096 switch, performs better than competing clusters at the same core count. Specifically, the Sun Blade X6250-based cluster beats a similarly equipped IBMBladeCenter HS21 XM-based cluster on "3 Vehicle Collision" problem by an average of 30%. Moreover, as evidenced in the table below, Sun's solution maintained 85% scalability efficiency despite the non-linear scalability nature inherent in these sub-optimal engineering codes.

TABLE 1. LS-DYNA "Topcrunch" benchmark
4 x Sun Blade X6250 server modules, 2 x Intel Xeon 5260, 16 GB RAM, 64-bit SLES10 OS

3-Car-Collision Model
# of CPU Cores Time (Sec) Scalability/Efficiency
1 n/a n/a
2 52442 n/a
4 26451 98.26
8 14426 83.36
 
Neon_Refined Model
# of CPU Cores Time (Sec) Scalability/Efficiency
1 7407 n/a
2 3901 89.87
4 1989 96.13
8 1058 88
 

(Tue, 22 January 2008)

Top-Notch Clustered Performance on FLUENT Benchmark Suite

Four Sun Blade X6250 server modules, each equipped with two dual-core Intel Xeon X5260 CPUs and running 64-bit SuSE Linux (SLES10) OS, have formed an eight CPU cluster that demonstrated outstanding performance on one of the most popular MCAE applications - FLUENT. The software solves fluid flow problems, is based on a numerical technique called computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and is heavily used in the automotive, aerospace and consumer products industries.

FLUENT offers two benchmarking suites that have distinctly different sets of problems incorporated into them. The "Standard" FLUENT v6.3 benchmark test suite consists of nine industrial CFD applications that are selected to demonstrate the performance of FLUENT on a variety of hardware platforms. The problems are divided into three varying in size classes: Small, Medium and Large.

The "New" FLUENT v6.3 benchmark test suite consists of seven larger models (both in memory requirements and mesh/model size) that are more suited for multi-node clustered environments and representative of modern engineering CFD clusters. Vendors benchmark their systems with the principal objective of providing comparative performance information for FLUENT software that, among other things, depends on compilers, optimization, interconnect, and the performance characteristics of the hardware.

According to the results that are listed on the above web sites, Sun's solution, using InfiniBand PCIe ExpressModules interconnected via Voltaire Grid Director ISR 9096 switch, performs better than competing clusters at the same core count. Specifically, the Sun Blade X6250-based cluster beats the similarly equipped IBM System x3550-based cluster on the "Standard" suite by as much as 64%, and an Intel quad-core whitebox-based cluster on the "New" suite by as much as 85%. Additionally, the average scalability efficiency of Sun's offering stayed above 90%, as the cluster grew in size up to the maximum of 8 cores, while IBM's average scalability was closer to 80%.

TABLE 1. Fluent v6.3 "Standard" benchmark
4 x Sun Blade X6250 server modules, 2 x Intel Xeon 5260, 16 GB RAM, 64-bit SLES10 OS

Fluent v6.3 Standard Benchmark
System # of CPU Cores FL5L1 FL5L2 FL5L3 Scalability Efficiency (%)
Sun X6250 3.33GHz DC 5260 1 259.4 178.5 32.4 -
IBM X3550 3GHz DC 5160 1 188 134.7 - -
Sun X6250 3.33GHz DC 5260 2 493.4 351.8 61.9 92.78
IBM X3550 3GHz DC 5160 2 342.6 236.8 55 79.02
Sun X6250 3.33GHz DC 5260 4 931.8 675.7 122 92.67
IBM X3550 3GHz DC 5160 4 623.5 411.4 94.9 76.09
Sun X6250 3.33GHz DC 5260 8 1811.3 1227.3 207.2 81.95
IBM X3550 3GHz DC 5160 8 1273.4 862.3 149.9 90.6
 

TABLE 2. Fluent v6.3 New benchmark
4 x Sun Blade X6250 server modules, 2 x Intel Xeon 5260, 16 GB RAM, 64-bit SLES10 OS

Fluent v6.3 New Benchmark
System # of CPU Cores Eddy (test case) Turbo (test case) Aircraft (test case) Sedan Truck14m Truckpoly Average Speedup (%)
Sun X6250 3.33GHz DC 5260 1 109.2 440.4 96.6 65.1 7 8.3 15.65
Intel 3.0GHz QC Harpertown 1 95.9 n/a 84.2 55.9 6.2 6.9 -
Sun X6250 3.33GHz DC 5260 2 208.9 823.1 178.8 121.3 14.6 16.1 13.91
Intel 3.0GHz QC Harpertown 2 183.1 741.3 162.9 109.6 12.4 13.4 -
Sun X6250 3.33GHz DC 5260 4 414.6 1590.4 353.8 246.2 29.9 31.9 n/a
Sun X6250 3.33GHz DC 5260 8 780.8 2805.2 577.1 384.4 55 57.3 72.43
Intel 3.0GHz QC Harpertown 8 491.4 1685 321 207.2 32.1 33.2 -
 

(Mon, 11 June 2007)

Sun and Intel Deliver One-Two Punch with a 4-Core Integer Throughput World Record

Operating system (OS) and compiler software often help to deliver the best performance by providing optimizations tailored to a specific hardware platform or microprocessor architecture.

Solaris 10 OS and Sun Studio 12 complier software, use many innovative optimization techniques targeted at x86 platforms. Sun's software running on the top of the Intel-based system architecture, propelled the Sun Blade 6250 server module to the top with the best 4-core result on integer-intensive throughput suite of the SPECcpu2006 benchmark. Equipped with two Dual-Core Intel Xeon 5160 processors, the Sun Blade X6250 server module, posted the SPECint_rate2006 result of 65.0.

The SPEC CPU2006 Benchmark exercises a computer's processor, memory architecture, and compilers on a variety of real-world compute intensive workloads and consists of two benchmark suites. One suite measures and compares compute-intensive integer performance and the other measures and compares floating point performance. For each of these suites, two metrics are collected, one measures how fast the computer completes a single task and the other measures how many tasks a computer can accomplish in a certain amount of time (the throughput).

(Wed, 06 June 2007)

Solaris Shines on Intel with World Record x86 Integer Performance

Sun's new Intel-based system, the Sun Blade X6250 server module enters the market with an attention-grabbing SPECint2006 result of 21.0.

The SPEC CPU2006 Benchmark exercises a computer's processor, memory architecture, and compilers on a variety of real-world compute intensive workloads and consists of two benchmark suites. One suite measures and compares compute-intensive integer performance and the other measures and compares floating point performance. For each of these suites, two metrics are collected, one measures how fast the computer completes a single task and the other measures how many tasks a computer can accomplish in a certain amount of time.

Operating system (OS) and compiler software often help to deliver the best performance by providing optimizations tailored to a specific hardware platform or microprocessor architecture. The advanced features of freely available Sun Studio 12 complier software allowed Sun Blade 6250 to successfully claim the top spot on a single integer task of the SPECcpu2006 benchmark. Equipped with the Dual-Core Intel Xeon 5160 processor, the Sun Blade X6250 server module uses many innovative optimization techniques targeted at x86 platforms that are inherent in Solaris 10, the most advanced OS on the planet.


									
									
										
									
									
										
									
									SPEC

The Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation (SPEC) is a non-profit corporation formed to establish, maintain and endorse a standardized set of relevant benchmarks that can be applied to the newest generation of high-performance computers. SPEC develops suites of benchmarks and also reviews and publishes submitted results from their member organizations and other benchmark licensees.


Sun, Sun Microsystems, the Sun logo, Java, J2EE, Sun Fire and The Network Is The Computer are trademarks or registered trademarks of Sun Microsystems, Inc. in the United States and other countries. SPEC and the benchmark names SPECviewperf, SPECweb, SPECint, SPEComp, SPECfp, SPECjAppServer, SPECjvm, SPECpower, SPECmail, SPECsfs and SPECjbb are registered trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. Sun's results have been submitted to SPEC. Competitive data obtained from http://www.spec.org as of the date located next to the respective claim. See the website for latest results. For comparison purposes, the terms CPU, chip and processor are used interchangeably. Each socket can accommodate one chip. SAP, R/3, mySAP reg TM of SAP AG in Germany and other countries. For the latest results and additional information visit www.sap.com/benchmark. TPC Benchmark C, tpmC, TPC-C, TPC Benchmark H, TPC-H, QphH are trademarks of the Transaction Performance Processing Council (TPC). More info http://www.tpc.org.